Re: [cn4j-alliance] CN4J Technical Call Tuesday??

[John Clingan <jclingan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

CN4J technical calls are canceled until further notice, with discussions to continue on this mailing list.

Thanks everyone for the feedback.

> On Sep 20, 2021, at 1:32 PM, John Clingan <jclingan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Any other comments. Unless I get positive feedback, I plan to cancel tomorrow’s call.
> 
>> On Sep 20, 2021, at 12:51 PM, David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> At the moment I'm not finding the calls terribly useful.  We seem to be ok to talk about things in the abstract, but when a concrete example appears such as MicroProfile Config/Jakarta Config, it's flagged up as inappropriate.  It makes me question the value of the having any abstract technical discussions.
>> 
>> I think there's value in having abstract and concrete technical discussions, but I think we could benefit from shifting to email for a period.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> David Blevins
>> http://twitter.com/dblevins
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> 
>>> On Sep 17, 2021, at 12:58 PM, John Clingan <jclingan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We have a couple of topics that we could talk about:
>>> 
>>> * Namespace
>>> * Moving specs between the working groups
>>> 
>>> However, before I continue to schedule the calls, I’d like to make sure of two things:
>>> 
>>> 1) The topics are timely and relevant
>>> 2) Attendees find these calls useful
>>> 
>>> Thoughts?
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cn4j-alliance mailing list
>>> cn4j-alliance@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cn4j-alliance
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cn4j-alliance mailing list
>> cn4j-alliance@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cn4j-alliance
>