Any other comments. Unless I get positive feedback, I plan to cancel tomorrow’s call.
On Sep 20, 2021, at 12:51 PM, David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At the moment I'm not finding the calls terribly useful. We seem to be ok to talk about things in the abstract, but when a concrete example appears such as MicroProfile Config/Jakarta Config, it's flagged up as inappropriate. It makes me question the value of the having any abstract technical discussions.
I think there's value in having abstract and concrete technical discussions, but I think we could benefit from shifting to email for a period.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Sep 17, 2021, at 12:58 PM, John Clingan <jclingan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We have a couple of topics that we could talk about:
>
> * Namespace
> * Moving specs between the working groups
>
> However, before I continue to schedule the calls, I’d like to make sure of two things:
>
> 1) The topics are timely and relevant
> 2) Attendees find these calls useful
>
> Thoughts?
>
> _______________________________________________
> cn4j-alliance mailing list
> cn4j-alliance@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cn4j-alliance
_______________________________________________
cn4j-alliance mailing list
cn4j-alliance@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cn4j-alliance
_______________________________________________
cn4j-alliance mailing list
cn4j-alliance@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cn4j-alliance
