| Re: [cn4j-alliance] MP apis and "graduation" to Jakarta EE |
I think it would be helpful to write some of this down in a
pro/con format. I think that could help inform further discussion
that may not take place here and also help inform all the
developers out there. If no one else wants to take that up, I can.
Reza Rahman
Jakarta EE Ambassador, Author, Blogger, Speaker
Please note views expressed here are my own as an individual
community member and do not reflect the views of my employer.
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 3:25 PM Emily Jiang <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Arjan,
Sadly we cannot rewrite the history. Since now we have two package names, there is not much value to change the namespace again. Besides, MP and Jakarta are working together under CN4J towards a full stack of Cloud Native foundation. There should be no superiority comparison between them but the collaboration and acceptance.
You're right Emily. Thanks for answering, and I agree mostly with that.
There's of course an advantage to not changing the package, but there's obviously also an advantage (IMHO) to do change them.
Kind regards,Arjan
_______________________________________________ cn4j-alliance mailing list cn4j-alliance@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cn4j-alliance