[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [che-dev] Issue tracking, triage, and sprint planning: is there a better option?
|
On 2/18/21 3:58 AM, Mykola Morhun wrote:
In my personal opinion, it is better to have everything in one place, so
I am +1 for keeping GH issues.
I have seen this point brought up by multiple people, but as far as I
can tell it's a matter of personal preference. Are there tangible
benefits to keeping the code and the issue tracker in the same place,
apart from easier issue linking?
Eric
- References:
- [che-dev] Issue tracking, triage, and sprint planning: is there a better option?
- Re: [che-dev] Issue tracking, triage, and sprint planning: is there a better option?
- Re: [che-dev] Issue tracking, triage, and sprint planning: is there a better option?
- Re: [che-dev] Issue tracking, triage, and sprint planning: is there a better option?
- Re: [che-dev] Issue tracking, triage, and sprint planning: is there a better option?
- Re: [che-dev] Issue tracking, triage, and sprint planning: is there a better option?
- Re: [che-dev] Issue tracking, triage, and sprint planning: is there a better option?
- Re: [che-dev] Issue tracking, triage, and sprint planning: is there a better option?
