Re: [che-dev] Issue tracking, triage, and sprint planning: is there a be

[Mykola Morhun <mmorhun@xxxxxxxxxx>]

In my personal opinion, it is better to have everything in one place, so I am +1 for keeping GH issues.

Also GH issues have a simple markdown format for code blocks, tables, unfolding sections with logs, etc. Whereas Jira requires more specific syntax.

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:43 AM Valerii Svydenko <vsvydenk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I find JIRA more useful to track issues and plan sprints but on another side it's better for me to have the issue tracker where the code is based. To me it's more comfortable and simpler to create and track my opened issues on GitHub, but again I don't spend too much time to filter or update labels/milestone, so I cannot judge this side.

I'd say my +1 is more for GitHub rather than for JIRA 

--

VALERII SVYDENKO

Red Hat 

vsvydenk@xxxxxxxxxx   

_______________________________________________
che-dev mailing list
che-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/che-dev

--

Mykola Morhun

Software engineer

Red Hat