Re: [che-dev] Java extension is getting bigger

[Sun Tan <sutan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

It is not a different discussion ... sorry Thomas, I don't see how my comment is related to https://github.com/eclipse/che/issues/13250.

We are talking about the best option to make available the quarkus extension to our end users. Some project(devfile) would use it, some others won't.

Sun Tan

Senior Software Engineer

Eclipse Che - CodeReady Workspaces @ Red Hat
Paris JUG leader

Red Hat Paris

sutan@xxxxxxxxxx    
M: +33621024173    

@sunsengdavidtan   me  

On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:23 PM Thomas Mäder <tmader@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 08/11/2019 14:03, Sun Tan wrote:
> hello,
> I think we should go for #1, but how do we deal with memory ---> sum
> of all the memoryLimit defined in each individual container ?

We'll have to define some policy, but I leave that to the kube experts.

> If not #1, Could we have `flavosr` ? like we have `java8`, `java11` we
> could have `java8-quarkus` that would be a first simple option doable
> in few hours.

I think this is an entirely different discussion:
https://github.com/eclipse/che/issues/13250. Target and runtime of the
tooling should not be the same.

/Thomas