[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 1.2 draft plan posted
|
Sorry, getting mixed up with all the mail last week.
I've included the concept of target in the build model that you can define
tools for, including both build and non-build tools.
Doug Schaefer, Senior Software Developer
IBM Rational Software, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Anthony Green <green@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
06/27/2003 11:23 AM
Please respond to
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
Re: [cdt-dev] CDT 1.2 draft plan posted
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 07:34, Douglas Schaefer wrote:
> Yes. It is safe to assume that if you can represent your build in a
> makefile, you'll be able to represent it in the new build framework (not
> to mention the standard make build). If not, then we need a better
> understanding of what you are trying to do.
I'm referring to the addr2line, objdump, etc problems that were
discussed last week.
AG
--
Anthony Green <green@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
