Re: [cdi-dev] Build compatible extensions vs Portable extensions - namin

[Ladislav Thon <lthon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think it's fair to say that the word "portable" is completely superfluous. If the extension mechanism is defined in the specification, it's portable by definition. The build compatible extension API is defined in the CDI specification (well mainly in the javadoc, just like portable extensions) and there shouldn't be anything vendor specific about it.

LT

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 4:22 PM arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

We now have two types of extensions in CDI; "Build compatible extensions" and "Portable extensions".

Do we mean to say that "Build compatible extensions" are not portable, and are vendor specific?

Kind regards,

Arjan Tijms

_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev