[cdi-dev] Build compatible extensions vs Portable extensions - naming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[cdi-dev] Build compatible extensions vs Portable extensions - naming

From: arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 16:21:57 +0100
Delivered-to: cdi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdi-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:cdi-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev>, <mailto:cdi-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/cdi-dev>, <mailto:cdi-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

We now have two types of extensions in CDI; "Build compatible extensions" and "Portable extensions".

Do we mean to say that "Build compatible extensions" are not portable, and are vendor specific?

Kind regards,

Arjan Tijms

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdi-dev] Build compatible extensions vs Portable extensions - naming
  - From: Ladislav Thon

Prev by Date: [cdi-dev] Weld Beta release for CDI 4 is now available
Next by Date: Re: [cdi-dev] Build compatible extensions vs Portable extensions - naming
Previous by thread: [cdi-dev] Weld Beta release for CDI 4 is now available
Next by thread: Re: [cdi-dev] Build compatible extensions vs Portable extensions - naming
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top