What these guys said.
Dave
On 12/17/15 9:48 AM, Doug Schaefer
wrote:
That all
looks good to me. For #4, Eclipse Andmore would be correct for
the vendor name. We use Eclipse CDT for CDT ones.
---------- Forwarded message
----------
From: Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:43 AM
Subject: FW: [andmore-dev] Naming of Andmore artifacts
To: Doug Schaefer < cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>
[1] I would say that is the right
place for the acknowledgement
[2] Yes
[3] I would not add the TM to those
components because it is covered in the outside
package name and the description.
[4] What's the standard here? I agree they
need to be consistent, but is there an accepted
practice? What do CDT, JDT, etc. do?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain
confidential information, privileged material (including
material protected by the solicitor-client or other
applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
information. Any use of this information by anyone other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have
received this transmission in error, please immediately
reply to the sender and delete this information from your
system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction
of this transmission by unintended recipients is not
authorized and may be unlawful.
_______________________________________________
andmore-dev mailing list
andmore-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/andmore-dev
|