[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[andmore-dev] Fwd: FW: Naming of Andmore artifacts
|
That all looks good to me. For #4, Eclipse Andmore would be correct for the vendor name. We use Eclipse CDT for CDT ones.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>Date: Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:43 AM
Subject: FW: [andmore-dev] Naming of Andmore artifacts
To: Doug Schaefer <
cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>
[1] I would say that is the right place for the acknowledgement
[2] Yes
[3] I would not add the TM to those components because it is covered in the outside package name and the description.
[4] What's the standard here? I agree they need to be consistent, but is there an accepted practice? What do CDT, JDT, etc. do?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
_______________________________________________
andmore-dev mailing list
andmore-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/andmore-dev