Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] CQ approval
Hi Wayne,

Thanks, this helps a lot.

Checked the code of the license tool and found a place in the maven plugin where default is still 75, maybe I misinterpret this ...
https://github.com/eclipse/dash-licenses/blob/4cba8e432495e39d7981382211595a4db84a9eae/maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/eclipse/dash/licenses/maven/LicenseCheckMojo.java#L108

-Matthias

On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 10:02 PM Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Matthias.

I've updated the handbook.

Like you, I've discovered that the score isn't as useful as I'd originally thought. Ultimately, it's really the licenses that are discovered that are interesting. I'm not quite ready to remove it from the criteria, but I have dropped it to 60 in both the handbook and in the Dash License Tool. 

There is some discussion here.

Wayne

On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 3:04 PM Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
According to the project handbook [1] a component needs at least "Licensed" score 75.
hamcrest 2.2 has "Licensed" score 60 [2]. That's why I filed a CQ.

I observed frequently that after triggering harvesting the "Licensed" score goes up to 60 and stops at that value.
Don't know what's required to reach 75 or higher. That's also the reason why I stopped
contributing curations to ClearlyDefined since I don't know what's missing to reach 75.

What I typically do to seek approval for a new component version:
  • open the page for that version in ClearlyDefined. If it wasn't yet harvested, this triggers harvesting of the new version
  • if it doesn't reach the required score in a few days I file a CQ since I don't have the time to visit ClearlyDefined over and over again

-Matthias

On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 11:02 AM Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Done.

Matthias, did the license tool requested to file a CQ for this? This library sounds like it should not require a CQ anymore.

-Gunnar

-- 
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/



On Jul 9, 2021, at 10:57, Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Could you please approve https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23599 ?

-Matthias
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc


--

Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

Back to the top