Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] CQ approval
According to the project handbook [1] a component needs at least "Licensed" score 75.
hamcrest 2.2 has "Licensed" score 60 [2]. That's why I filed a CQ.

I observed frequently that after triggering harvesting the "Licensed" score goes up to 60 and stops at that value.
Don't know what's required to reach 75 or higher. That's also the reason why I stopped
contributing curations to ClearlyDefined since I don't know what's missing to reach 75.

What I typically do to seek approval for a new component version:
  • open the page for that version in ClearlyDefined. If it wasn't yet harvested, this triggers harvesting of the new version
  • if it doesn't reach the required score in a few days I file a CQ since I don't have the time to visit ClearlyDefined over and over again

-Matthias

On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 11:02 AM Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Done.

Matthias, did the license tool requested to file a CQ for this? This library sounds like it should not require a CQ anymore.

-Gunnar

-- 
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/



On Jul 9, 2021, at 10:57, Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Could you please approve https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23599 ?

-Matthias
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

Back to the top