Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need to file a CQ?

[Fred Bricon <fbricon@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Mickael is correct. No CQ is required.

Ok thanks everyone!

The only questionable part is whether or not we can reasonably assert that the contribution was created "under the supervision of the PMC". We generally take this to mean that the contribution is part of the project plan, or in response to a documented issue, or otherwise comes to the project as a natural part of its evolution.

By way of example, if the contribution comes completely "out of the blue" or you have reason to suspect that some of the content may have come from unknown sources, then you should engage the IP Team.

There's no ambiguity on the origin or the intent of the contribution, which will help implement a feature on our backlog. We even pay Valerii to do it :-)

 

Wayne

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Fred,

I'm no PMC but I believe this case is covered by figure 2 of the Legal Poster. As Valerii is a colleague of yours and Red Hat did sign the member agreement, it seems to me you're good to merge the code if there is no other concern.

Cheers,

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

--

Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects

The Eclipse Foundation

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

--

"Have you tried turning it off and on again" - The IT Crowd

And if that fails, then http://goo.gl/tnBgH5