Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need to file a CQ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need to file a CQ?

From: Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 16:35:12 +0200
Delivered-to: technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/technology-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Fred,

I'm no PMC but I believe this case is covered by figure 2 of the Legal Poster. As Valerii is a colleague of yours and Red Hat did sign the member agreement, it seems to me you're good to merge the code if there is no other concern.

Cheers,

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need to file a CQ?
  - From: Wayne Beaton

References:
- [technology-pmc] Do we need to file a CQ?
  - From: Fred Bricon

Prev by Date: Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need to file a CQ?
Next by Date: Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need to file a CQ?
Previous by thread: Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need to file a CQ?
Next by thread: Re: [technology-pmc] Do we need to file a CQ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs