| Re: [polarsys-iwg] Draft Top Level Project Proposal for review |
Hello Wayne, as you said, a flat organization is simpler to maintain: we were rather thinking about a kind of tagging system on projects, helping to filter and browse them. That’s how we could implement the logical view you are talking about. Beyond that, I am not sure Polarsys members will have enough resources to participate to too many committees. There are already the steering committee, an architecture committee, various PPC and PMC… So I guess only one TLP PMC is enough for now J -- Pierre De : polarsys-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:polarsys-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Wayne Beaton The "Project Organization" section lists three different categories of project. Each of these categories seems like it might be appropriate as a top-level project with a separate PMC. Dear Wayne, dear all, -- The information in this e-mail is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Airbus immediately and delete this e-mail. Airbus cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this e-mail as it has been sent over public networks. If you have any concerns over the content of this message or its Accuracy or Integrity, please contact Airbus immediately. All outgoing e-mails from Airbus are checked using regularly updated virus scanning software but you should take whatever measures you deem to be appropriate to ensure that this message and any attachments are virus free. |