Re: [pde-dev] Java Build Path Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [pde-dev] Java Build Path Control

From: "Bob Foster" <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 18:06:20 -0500
Delivered-to: pde-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/pde-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:pde-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pde-dev>, <mailto:pde-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pde-dev>, <mailto:pde-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Mathias,

Posting digitally signed email is an affectation. Your mail is not that
important.

Posting digitally signed email that causes a security warning is completely
unacceptable. And impractical. Only idiots don't delete such messages
immediately and hopefully there aren't any idiots around here, so nobody
will read them.

Bob Foster

References:
- RE: [pde-dev] Java Build Path Control
  - From: Bheemesh C

Prev by Date: RE: [pde-dev] Java Build Path Control
Next by Date: [pde-dev] PDE Build 3.0
Previous by thread: RE: [pde-dev] Java Build Path Control
Next by thread: RE: [pde-dev] Java Build Path Control
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs