Hi,
I have not looked at
the latest patch set yet, I just wanted to give a quick comment,
since I saw that you wanted to get the model added to the Oomph
catalogue (which I think will be great).
As part
of https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/69746/ Celine
proposed to rename the project in which this setup-file is placed.
Celine's argument was that it needed to follow naming rules which
disallows '-' to be included in the project name. I made the
comment that any change to the project name, will impact the
installation instructions, including any users that already have
followed these instructions and now have a reference to the setup
file via a plain git resource link as given by the instructions
at https://wiki.eclipse.org/Papyrus-RT/User_Guide/Eclipse_Installer
Since I do know that
the Oomph catalogue uses exactly the same approach using a plain
git resource link, we will "bump into" yet another issue if we
later decide to change the name of the project containing these
setup-files, then with both the product setup files as well as the
new project setup files.
So I would really
like to settle the name of this project. I do know that Celine
reverted the name of the project in later patch sets of that Gerrit
change, but I guess Celine still thinks that the project should
align its names. As I indicated in that Gerrit change, I think that
Charles should give his view on any name change, since it will
impact the installation guide (which Charles has mainly worked
with) and the aspect on the impact on any existing users that now
has references to a file in this project in the Git
repo.
Simplest would of
course be if we just accepted that this project keep its name which
does not follow the naming conventions. But I don't know what kind
of impact that will have.... Celine, please give your view
regarding this.
/Peter
Cigéhn
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit