Re: [jsonb-dev] Volunteer to apply a package rename to TCKs to avoid `ja

[Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 1/11/22 2:44 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:

Hi,

Following up on the Platform ML discussion [1] about TCK package names not starting with `jakarta` package for various reasons.  I'm not sure if or when a TCK package rename PR would be merged but wanted to ask if having such a pr would help?  I'll give it a shot if yes.

Perhaps change from `jakarta.json.bind.tck` to `json.bind.tck`?

https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jsonb-api/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+TCK has some pending TCK changes.  Any preference for whether we wait for that work to complete before removing `jakarta` from the TCK package name? 

FYI, my motivation for removing `jakarta` is to respond to the concern that some implementations might not be able to pass the TCK due to the use of `jakarta` package in TCK tests.

Perhaps change from jakarta.jsonp.tck` to `jsonp.tck`?

For reference, https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jsonp/pull/351 is open for removing `jakarta` from the TCK package name.

Or something else, perhaps from the now-unofficial survey [2]?

Scott

[1] https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jakartaee-platform-dev/msg03130.html
[2] https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf2zO8dqSZuehho2kpnot09DPveV_jJpPAzVn93tiQLda54hw/viewform?vc=0&c=0&w=1&flr=0