[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [gemini-dev] switch for blueprint support
|
Thanks Andrew. Further discussion will take place in the bug.
Regards,
Glyn
On 22 Apr 2013, at 21:46, Andrew Clemons <andrewclemons@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Glyn,
>
> On 2013-04-22 09:09:01 +0100, Glyn Normington wrote:
>> Thanks for this Andrew.
>>
>> There is a design issue with multiple extenders competing to extend a
>> particular application bundle. The OSGi Alliance is defining some
>> standard generic capabilities that extenders can provide and
>> applications can require so that an application can say that it needs
>> a particular extender, although I'm not sure that much thought has
>> been given to selecting between distinct implementations of the same
>> extender standard. I'll mention this use case
>> So your patch is probably a necessary evil. ;-)
>
> Great, thanks for that.
>
>> Please could you raise a bug and attach the patch. ChainActivator
>> seems like a reasonable spot for the new logic.
>
> This is the ticket:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=406255
>
>> Your patch would also be useful in scenarios where Gemini Blueprint
>> and Aries Blueprint need to co-exist, such as when running Aries
>> Subsystems in Virgo ([1]).
>
> Just having a look at this now.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gemini-dev mailing list
> gemini-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemini-dev