[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [gemini-dev] switch for blueprint support
|
Glyn,
On 2013-04-22 09:09:01 +0100, Glyn Normington wrote:
> Thanks for this Andrew.
>
> There is a design issue with multiple extenders competing to extend a
> particular application bundle. The OSGi Alliance is defining some
> standard generic capabilities that extenders can provide and
> applications can require so that an application can say that it needs
> a particular extender, although I'm not sure that much thought has
> been given to selecting between distinct implementations of the same
> extender standard. I'll mention this use case
> So your patch is probably a necessary evil. ;-)
Great, thanks for that.
> Please could you raise a bug and attach the patch. ChainActivator
> seems like a reasonable spot for the new logic.
This is the ticket:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=406255
> Your patch would also be useful in scenarios where Gemini Blueprint
> and Aries Blueprint need to co-exist, such as when running Aries
> Subsystems in Virgo ([1]).
Just having a look at this now.
Attachment:
pgpCaetCTIbzz.pgp
Description: PGP signature