[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [gef-dev] GEF4 0.3.0 vs. 1.0.0, GitHub migration
|
Hi team,
I think we have then finalized our decision and have agreed on contributing 1.0.0 to Neon. I will announce this on cross-projects (and again here) when promoting M5 in a week.
Regarding GitHub, it seems we are all convinced that migrating our project would be beneficial and I thus regard this decision as being made as well. As I do not want to disturb our active development (we will be quite busy up to M7), I would propose to schedule such a migration for after the Neon feature freeze (M7). This would also give us further time to clarify the details (Would we have to migrate both repositories? What implications would that have? etc.). I will contact the foundation and will keep you updated.
Cheers Alexander
Hi, +1 for contributing 1.0.0 to Neon. +1 for moving Git repo and issues to GitHub. For the reasons Zoltán described I'd prefer a review process without rebasing on GitHub. I can see the motivation for keeping GEF 3.x on the old infrastructure, but wouldn't it actually be easier for everybody (users, developers, Foundation IT) to have it all in one place? Cheers, Fabian _______________________________________________ gef-dev mailing list gef-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gef-dev
-- Dr. Alexander Nyßen Dipl.-Inform. Principal Engineer Telefon: +49 (0) 231 / 98 60-202 Telefax: +49 (0) 231 / 98 60-211 Mobil: +49 (0) 151 / 17396743 http://www.itemis.de alexander.nyssen@xxxxxxxxx itemis AG Am Brambusch 15-24 44536 Lünen Rechtlicher Hinweis: Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 20621 Vorstand: Jens Wagener (Vors.), Wolfgang Neuhaus, Dr. Georg Pietrek, Jens Trompeter, Sebastian Neus Aufsichtsrat: Prof. Dr. Burkhard Igel (Vors.), Michael Neuhaus, Jennifer Fiorentino
|
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail