Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [faces-dev] Modularizing Faces

p.s.

Taking the JDK analogy, @Manfred Riem maybe you can start with looking at this for Mojarra? See if it can be done at the implementation level, then if so, the API can follow.

Also note that at the moment EE 9 does not even have the automatic-module name officially defined. It's also not in the EE 9.1 plan, so EE is atm way behind wrt modules.

Kind regards,
Arjan


On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 6:04 PM arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 5:41 PM Rudy De Busscher <rdebusscher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As mentioned, I don't see the benefit of this. We will end up with a main/core module having 90% of the functionality and then 5 modules having each 2 % of the functionality. 

This modularization will not benefit the end user but only confuse him and doesn't give any benefits.

Maybe we could learn from the JDK. Why was that one modularized? Does the modular JDK also not benefit the end user and only confuses? If so, why would the OpenJDK have put in the effort?

Kind regards,
Arjan



 

Back to the top