Re: [dali-dev] refactorings

[Markus Kuppe <mkuppe@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul Fullbright wrote:
> OR
>
> We could have one view with outline and properties together, if they're 
> intended to work together anyway.
>
>
> Karen Moore wrote:
> > Markus,
> >
> > I am not sure that bug 128879 is really a bug, it is as designed.  That's
> > certainly up for discussion though since I think one could probably 
> > make the
> > case for only showing the Persistence Properties View. 
> > I originally linked the Persistence Properties View with the Persistence
> > Outline View so that you could choose whether you wanted the Persistence
> > Outline View to be linked with the Editor (see the "Link with Editor"
> > button).  If you unselect this button you could be viewing one thing 
> > in the
> > outline and properties view while editing somewhere else in the file.  
> > One
> > option is that we could also have a "Link with Editor" button on the
> > Persistence Properties View, but that doesn't seem to make much sense 
> > to me
> > if it is also supposed to be linked with the outline view.  We can 
> > discuss
> > this more in the meeting, just wanted to explain my original thought
> > process.
> >
> > Karen

Hi,

I still think different views should work independent of each other. 
There are certainly views that interact with each other, however they 
can and should work independently from each other.
In case we want to display the old element in the 
PropertiesPersistenceView while editing a different element in the 
editor, we need the "Link with Editor" button in the 
PersistencePropertiesView as well.

Bye
Markus