Re: [wtp-releng] JSF and JPA: Please confirm desired map branches

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I've created the R2_0_maintenance branch
for 
releng.dali 
and synch'd it up with the bit you'd
been doing in R3_0_maintenance. 

ready to switch over? Or, are you in
the middle of making all the other changes I've asked for lately?  :)


Once we're all settled, I'll remove
the R3_0_maintenance branch (marker/tag) to avoid confusion. 

thanks,

From:	Trân Lê <tran.le@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:	Webtools releng discussion list <wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	06/22/2008 03:04 PM
Subject:	Re: [wtp-releng] JSF and JPA: Please confirm desired map branches

---

David,

I think that we would prefer R2_0_maintenance for the Dali maintenance
branch.

Thanks.

David M Williams wrote: 

I've noticed 
that both Dali and JSF map projects used R1_0_maintenance for our WTP 2.0
maintenance, 
since they were at the 1.0 level in WTP 2.0. 
That's fine, makes sense, and should continue. 

But, when making the branches for our 3.0 maintenance I branched Dali and
JSF to R3_0_maintenance. 
I just went from memory, and forget we had different branches for map files
for these two subprojects. 

So ... my question is ... what would you like? We can re-branch Dali and
JSF maps so they are R2_0_maintenance, if you two subprojects find that
better ... or, we can leave at R3_0_maintenance if 
you would like. It's up to you. 

Just wanted to be explicit about it. 

Thanks,

---

_______________________________________________
wtp-releng mailing list
wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-releng
  
_______________________________________________
wtp-releng mailing list
wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-releng