Hi David,
For the JSF Tools Project,
R3_0_maintenance is fine. We expect JSF to stay in synch with the WTP release.
-Raghu
From: TRAN.LE@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 12:03
PM
To: Webtools
releng discussion list
Subject: Re: [wtp-releng] JSF and
JPA: Please confirm desired map branches
David,
I think that we would prefer R2_0_maintenance for the Dali maintenance branch.
Thanks.
David M Williams wrote:
I've
noticed
that both Dali and JSF
map projects used R1_0_maintenance for our WTP 2.0 maintenance,
since they were at the
1.0 level in WTP 2.0.
That's fine, makes
sense, and should continue.
But, when making the
branches for our 3.0 maintenance I branched Dali and JSF to R3_0_maintenance.
I just went from memory,
and forget we had different branches for map files for these two subprojects.
So ... my question is
... what would you like? We can re-branch Dali and JSF maps so they are
R2_0_maintenance, if you two subprojects find that better ... or, we can leave
at R3_0_maintenance if
you would like. It's up
to you.
Just wanted to be
explicit about it.
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
wtp-releng mailing list
wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-releng
