Re: [wtp-releng] WTP Build Status and smoke testing?

[Cameron Bateman <cameron.bateman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

JSF smoke test passed with following error log issue:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=184291
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=184292
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=184295

Wiki updated.

--Cam

Keith Chong wrote:

> The WTP 1.5.4 build was also respun last night.   Here is the latest:
>
> http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/committers/drops/R1.5/M-RC1.5.4-200704260535/ 
>
>
> Regards,
> Keith Chong
>
>
>
>
> *David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>*
> Sent by: wtp-releng-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 26/04/2007 12:29 PM
> Please respond to
> Webtools releng discussion list <wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> 	
> To
> 	Webtools releng discussion list <wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
> 	Webtools releng discussion list <wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 
> wtp-releng-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject
> 	Re: [wtp-releng] WTP Build Status and smoke testing?
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > So which build is the 2.0 candidate for smoke test this week?
>
> The most recent one.
> *
> But*, those causing a build after the request-for-smoke-test has been 
> sent are supposed to send a note to wtp-releng say why
> they are requiring a respin. To fix blocking, critical, or regression 
> bugs are usually good reasons ... but you have to let us all know 
> what's going on!
> We should not all have to investigate build diffs to figure out why 
> you caused a re-spin.
>
> In particular, please mention if your bug is of the type that others 
> should not bother smoke testing yet, or if your fix requires other 
> teams to re-smoke test.
>
> We'll take more draconian measures if people do not abide by this 
> simple, "just enough" policy towards rebuilds ... for example, we can 
> simple
> turn off the autobuild, and put in place an approval process? This 
> approach also requires someone to actually check that no other changes 
> were made,
> except those that were approved ... and I would _really_ like to avoid 
> it.
>
> But .... if anyone would prefer the stricter controls, and the delays 
> they cost, then feel free to say so and all the committers can decide.
>
> I suspect these week was worse than most, since there were a number of 
> very-broken builds due to new pre-reqs, new plugins/packages, etc.
> (If not that, then it's just because John is traveling for a few days, 
> and every thing turns to chaos without his constant shepherding :)
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> *Cameron Bateman <cameron.bateman@xxxxxxxxxx>*
> Sent by: wtp-releng-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 04/26/2007 12:00 PM
> Please respond to
> Webtools releng discussion list <wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> 	
> To
> 	Webtools releng discussion list <wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	Re: [wtp-releng] WTP Build Status and smoke testing?
>
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
>
> So which build is the 2.0 candidate for smoke test this week?  Three or
> four integration builds have occurred since the declaration was sent.
>
>
> --Cam
> _______________________________________________
> wtp-releng mailing list
> wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-releng
> _______________________________________________
> wtp-releng mailing list
> wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-releng
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> wtp-releng mailing list
> wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-releng
>