I'm moving this discussion out of the initial contribution CQ...
This sort of conversation is generally appropriate for a "dev" list
in my world. I'm assuming that it is appropriate discussion for the
udig-devel list as well. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I've copied the following discussion out of the CQ and have offered
some replies inline.
The devel/ directory contains some "installer" bits that appear to
be NullSoft installer-specific. This potentially makes the NullSoft
installer a third-party dependency that is subject to the IP Due
Diligence process. I'm not sure about whether or not the
distribution license is acceptable. This will require some
additional investigation.
If the intent is just to provide scripts that can be used to
generate the installer, but not actually distribute the results,
then we may be able to get away with a "works with" CQ (see
discussion below). If the intent is to distribute the installer,
then we have some work to do.
If it's not required, then it should be removed from the initial
contribution. By virtue of it being a JAR, I believe that Sharon has
already removed it.
What is lib/scala-csw-client ? Is it project code? Is it distributed
with uDig builds?
Should we pull the tutorial source as well, or would you rather keep
it with the project?
Perhaps the tutorial can remain on GitHub.
FWIW, some work has been done on jai_imageio, but there was some
problematic code. At some point--should you choose to pursue it--we
can just open a CQ and get IP team to help us sort out what needs to
be done.
Version 1.2.13 and 1.2.15 are both approved. Can you just update to
one of those versions?
I assume that you mean that these are placeholders for third party
JARs that may or may not be present. If a third party library may be
leveraged if it is present but the project is otherwise functional
without that library, you'd need a "works with" CQ.
These are described in the Third party libraries policy:
http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse_Policy_and_Procedure_for_3rd_Party_Dependencies_Final.pdf
The short version is the the project's PMC needs to discuss and
approve the "works with" use in a public forum (normally the PMC
mailing list) and unanimously decide that the use is reasonable
before approving the CQ.
The policy is that you need a CQ for each third-party JAR directly
used by the project or by any other third-party JAR. If the JAR is
inherited through another Eclipse or LocationTech project, but is
not directly used by uDig, then you don't require a CQ. Hamcrest
tends to included by virtue of making direct use of JUnit. In this
case, you would require a CQ, because your test code makes direct
use of JUnit (a third-party library). If uDig instead had a indirect
dependency on Hamcrest by virtue of a direct dependency on the
org.eclipse.platform bundle (a completely made-up example), then you
wouldn't need to the CQ. Make sense?
I expect that this falls under the "works with" discussion above.
"Works with" ?
A "piggyback" CQ is needed if you're directly accessing the
libraries. CQ 1537 covers iText 1.45.2 and CQ 3475 covers iText
2.1.7.
i.e. they are not required?
They look like p2 artifacts. Frank suggested (on the CQ) that a
.gitignore entry should be created for these.
Is there any related code that can also be removed? Anything that we
can take off the IP team's plate will make the approval process run
faster.
Feel free to carve this up into separate threads as appropriate.
Wayne
|