Re: [udig-devel] 1.1.x to eclipse 3.4

[Jesse Eichar <jesse.eichar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Not a big deal.  It just would make some merges to trunk easier.  But  
if it causes extra work for you then don't worry.  Which additional  
eclipse packages do you need to create for eclipse 3.4 that you don't  
need for 3.3?

Jesse

On 7-Jan-09, at 12:08 PM, andrea antonello wrote:

> Not very glad, since I would have to recreate the additional eclipse
> packages for JGrass. Which means open them and tinkle them to remove
> additional menu entries for import export and repackage them and such
> things. I hoped to have to do it only for trunk again.
>
> Any particular reason for 1.1.x?
>
> Andrea
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Jesse Eichar
> <jesse.eichar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any one object to moving 1.1.x to eclipse 3.4?
> >
> > Jesse
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> > http://udig.refractions.net
> > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel