Re: [udig-devel] Strange SLD behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [udig-devel] Strange SLD behavior

From: Andrea Aime <aaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:05:48 +0200
Delivered-to: udig-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://lists.refractions.net/pipermail/udig-devel>
List-help: <mailto:udig-devel-request@lists.refractions.net?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel>, <mailto:udig-devel-request@lists.refractions.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel>, <mailto:udig-devel-request@lists.refractions.net?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

Jody Garnett ha scritto:

Stranger and stranger; to get a fair test you may need to turn back theclock to GeoServer 1.3; unless you are doing these tests on uDig trunk?


Funny, why going back to GeoServer 1.3? Ah, because the filter behaviour

has changed... 1.4 is still using the geotools 2.2.x thought, so itshould be even closer to whatever uDig is doing.

Cheers
Andrea

References:
- [udig-devel] Strange SLD behavior
  - From: David Adler
- Re: [udig-devel] Strange SLD behavior
  - From: Jody Garnett

Prev by Date: [udig-devel] asking help for making a dynamic show of a flood
Next by Date: Re: [udig-devel] asking help for making a dynamic show of a flood
Previous by thread: Re: [udig-devel] Strange SLD behavior
Next by thread: Re: [udig-devel] Strange SLD behavior
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top