Re: [udig-devel] Re: ImageIO-GDAL integration

[Aleksander Bandelj <aleksander.bandelj@xxxxxxxxxx>]

My experience is that ECW decoding is much more expensive than TIFF one. 
So, compactness yes, speed no. Fine for a single client, but not so good 
for a server ...

Andrea Aime wrote:
> Paul Ramsey ha scritto:
> > I would very much like to see an ECW driver or (even better) a JP2000 
> > driver from this project, as such a thing would be widely useful for 
> > end users.  My priority order would be: JP2000, LAN, ECW, AUX.  I 
> > assume GeoTIFF is already handled by the existing coverage work?  If 
> > not, it would go first.
> Well, I second Daniele's choice since, at least here in Italy, you 
> either support
> ECW or they'll start laughing at you. Geotiff is so '90s (it has his 
> merits, but
> everybody seems to have gone nuts for ECW's speed and compactness).
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel