[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [udig-devel] BBox cut-offset
|
>
>Wow Dave this is going to be a fun trade off.
>
>UDig needs the bounding box to be "hard" because we occasionally
request >back an *exact* bounding box we wish filled in. Especially
when working >with transparent fills drawing outside of the allowed
bounding box clip >area would be considered a bad thing. We already had
a few reports of >hitting refresh and tricking the renderer into
"darkening" a fill area.
>
I'm not sure what you're saying here - are you requesting maps with a
background colour that isnt transparent? What do you mean?
The only reason that I can see of not asking for a
slightly-larger-than-the-data-bounding box would be if the actual
request would have an illegal bounding box (ie. go off the edge of the
poles). Certainly some WMS servers wouldnt like that!
dave
----------------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: https://webmail.limegroup.com/
