Re: [udig-devel] SVN

[Richard Gould <rgould@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Should I make a psf file for the fragments? Is there actually interest 
for that?

Jody Garnett wrote:

> Matthias Basler wrote:
>
> > Hi developers,
> > speaking about how to find out about new/deleted packages:
> >
> > There is the option offered by your project to use the "automatic" 
> > checkout with
> > Subclipse using the "uDig.psf" project file.
> >  
> I find this frustrating - I endevour to keep that file up todate (it 
> does represent the easiest option to aquire sourcecode).
>
> > Whilst this idea is good, in practice it is rather problematic if 
> > this file is
> > not always up-to-date.
> I do a fresh checkout twice a week to ensure everything still works.  
> If you catch the psf not being uptodate please send
> me an email.
>
> > In future I will just use the "manual checkout" with Subclipse, that is,
> > download all fragemnts and plugins (or the ones I need). That's easy 
> > too and
> > free of such problems.
> >  
> Cheers,
> Jody
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel