Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] Seeking PMC approval for Sapphire 0.1 and 0.2 releases

In reviewing examples of release review documentation I have noticed some projects dropping the slide format in favor a web page or a wiki. I have followed that pattern.

 

Here are the links to the release review documentation for 0.1 and 0.2 releases.

 

http://www.eclipse.org/sapphire/releases/0.1/review.php

http://www.eclipse.org/sapphire/releases/0.2/review.php

 

I have tried to keep the documentation to the point and not needlessly repeat information found in say the project plan, but do let me know if more content is necessary in any area.

 

- Konstantin

 

 

From: technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Konstantin Komissarchik
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 2:42 PM
To: 'Technology PMC'
Subject: [technology-pmc] Seeking PMC approval for Sapphire 0.1 and 0.2 releases

 

I’d like to request PMC approval to proceed with release reviews for Sapphire 0.1 and 0.2 releases. Both releases are currently scheduled for 2011-01-10. I hope there is still time to run through the review process.

 

The initial contribution has final IP approval and IP log has be submitted to EMO.

 

I am working on release review documentation. In the meantime here is some information on these two releases:

 

http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?planurl=http://www.eclipse.org/sapphire/plans/0.1.xml

http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?planurl=http://www.eclipse.org/sapphire/plans/0.2.xml

 

The 0.1 release represents a snapshot of a stable code base as contributed by Oracle and adapted for Eclipse namespace, license, about, build, etc. The 0.2 release contains significant functional enhancements over 0.1 release (as documented in the plan document). They are scheduled to release concurrently since work on 0.2 was proceeding while we were waiting for final IP approval on the initial contribution.

 

Let me know if there are any questions.

 

Thanks,

 

- Konstantin


Back to the top