[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Judith Gull
|
Matthias & Andreas,
In accordance with the committer elections policy
(http://wiki.eclipse.org/Technology#Committer_Elections), each
nomination should include specific evidence of the person's
contributions to the project. The most typical evidence is Eclipse
bugzilla entries that included patches which were reviewed and committed
by an existing committer.
I'm sure the recent candidates are sufficiently qualified, but in the
interest of openness and meritocracy, please re-submit those nominations
with the supporting evidence so that we may approve.
Thanks,
Eric
On 11/30/10 5:56 PM, portal on behalf of emo wrote:
technology PMC Members,
This automatically generated message marks the completion of voting for
Judith Gull's Committer status on the technology.scout project. As a PMC
member, you can approve or disapprove this vote through your My Foundation
portal page:
http://portal.eclipse.org/
Judith Gull was nominated by Matthias Zimmermann as follows:
judith has contributed over 20 bug fixes since july 2010
Vote summary: 4/0/0 with 0 not voting
+1 Andreas Hoegger
+1 Stephan Leicht
+1 Ivan Motsch
+1 Matthias Zimmermann
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
