[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [technology-pmc] Candidates for Termination/Continuation reviews
|
I find myself wrestling with the purpose of a continuation review.
he purpose of a Continuation Review is to verify that a Proposal or
Project continues to be a viable effort and a credit to Eclipse. The
Project team will be expected to explain the recent technical progress
and to demonstrate sufficient adopter, developer, and user support for
the Project. The goal of the Continuation Review is to avoid having
inactive projects looking promising but never actually delivering
extensible frameworks and exemplary tools to the ecosystem.
Asking for a continuation review seems like a pretty obvious thing to do
for both projects. Frankly, there's no way that it can happen until Q1
anyway. FWIW, I'd rather work with the projects on this issue than
simply tell them what they need to do. I'll plan to discuss this
directly with the project leads next week.
Wayne
Eric Rizzo wrote:
On Dec 3, 2009, at 3:29 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
Does the dev process specify the frequency of continuation reviews for
incubating projects? If not, it seems to me that it would make sense
to wait
until after Q1 to take any actions as the situation would resolve or
change
by then such that concrete actions could be taken. It seems to me that a
continuation review at this stage would not actually accomplish
anything. We
already know that they are stuck and why they are stuck.
That makes way too much sense, Konstantin. :-)
Seriously, I think that is a good idea and one that would address the
concerns I expressed earlier about m2e.
Eric
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
