Hi Jakob,
Thank you for your guidance. I find them very useful.
But my first question seems not solved yet. I'm sorry that I did not describe the question clearly. The inflow did not come from the input route file, but instead from the edge data output results, which were declared in the additional file (the 'departed' value of this edge is 1246 in fifteen minutes), I also put a loop detector at the beginning of the road segment and the inflow of 4 lanes sums up to 4952veh/h. I just checked the GUI and found that congestion didn't spread to the input position before the end of the data collection cycle.
E1, E2, and E3 are from the upstream section to the downstream one. E1 and E2 are 4km long (in total) and have 4 lanes, while E3 is 200m long and has 2 lanes.
This is the output of loop detectors at the beginning of the road segment, respectively on each lane.
This is the edge data output file, which I collect the data from. The collection cycle is 15 min. The inflow is collected as the 'departed' at E1, and the throughput is collected from the 'entered' value of E3, i.e. 717 veh (15min,2lanes). I'm wondering if some parameters of vehicle type are set inappropriately. There are two vehicle types in my route file, which are different in driving styles:
<vType id="type_1" speedDev="0.5" accel="2.5" decel="4.0" tau="1.5" length="5" color="0,1,0" vClass="passenger" maxSpeed="20" carFollowModel="Krauss" laneChangeModel="LC2013" lcCooperative="0.2" lcSpeedGain="0.5" lcPushy="0.5"/>
<vType id="TYpe_2" speedDev="0.5" accel="2.5" decel="4.0" tau="1.8" length="5" color="0,1,1" vClass="passenger" maxSpeed="20" carFollowModel="Krauss" laneChangeModel="LC2013" lcCooperative="0.8" lcSpeedGain="0.2"/>
Looking forward to your reply. Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Xuanmian He
