Re: [sumo-user] effects of low frequency small capacity bus in intermoda

[Jakob Erdmann <namdre.sumo@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Gerald,

I suspect that under those conditions a proportion of riders would not even attempt to use that mode of transport so that some sort of equilibrium is reached and only a few users actually have to re-schedule. So while "rethinking" at runtime would help I don't think it is the best/complete solution.

You could try to iterate the simulation with different mode shares to find this equilibrium point.

There is only limited support for re-routing intermodal trips at the moment. Function traci.person.reroute only applies to persons that walk or stop and then walk. What you could do is call traci.simulation.findIntermodalRoute and then replace the current plan with a new one.

regards,

Jakob

Am Mo., 5. Okt. 2020 um 13:14 Uhr schrieb Richter Gerald <Gerald.Richter@xxxxxxxxx>:

Hi all,

I would like to know, what is the expected consistent behavior or consequence when introducing
an experimental, small passenger capacity vehicle into an inter modal transportation scenario

which services the line at rather low frequency.

The pedestrians that are planning on getting somewhere actually have no idea, if the vehicle will be full or not.

So from the technical simulation viewpoint, they should probably end up waiting for a very long time, if the vehicle already was full at the stop.

I suspect I am seeing quite unwanted things in my simulations.

To mitigate such undesired effects, would it be necessary, to make the pedestrians rethink their route at the stop?

thanks,

Gerald 

_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user