| Re: [sumo-user] Flow definition disrepancy |
Dear all,
does anyone know how it is possible to simulate the impact of variables
message signs giving informations about road congestions in following
streets?
Thanks,
Massimiliano
---
-------------------------------------------------
Eng.Massimiliano Petri
mobile:+39.3929169328
e-mail: m.petri@xxxxxxxxxxxx
University of Pisa
University Center 'Logistic Systems'
Via dei Pensieri, 60
57128-Livorno
Il 07-03-2020 00:10 Chedly Bourguiba ha scritto:
> Hi Jakob,
>
> Thank you for your quick response.
>
> We are currently defining the flows for one single time period, for
> one single intersection. We have specified the number of vehicles
> entering an approach (259). The approach has 5 lanes (2 for right
> turns, 2 for thru movements and 1 for the left turn). We have also
> defined the turning probabilities for left, thru and right.
>
> When we run the simulation, however, the output numbers are
> significantly higher for the thru movement lanes than expected (based
> on the number of total vehicles at the approach multiplied by the
> probability for the thru movement). In addition, the right turn
> movements and the left turn movements are close to what they should
> be. Consequently, the total number of vehicles at that approach is
> higher than the number we expect from the flow file. We're struggling
> to understand how this behaviour could be possible. We've checked that
> the flow number in the flow file and the turning probabilities in the
> turns file are correct.
>
> Do you know any possible reasons why this should be happening? Let me
> know if you need any further information to diagnose.
>
> Thanks,
> Chedly
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 10:52 PM Jakob Erdmann <namdre.sumo@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The traffic demand given to SUMO typically does not specify the
>> exact lane sequence. This means individual lanes could see higher
>> flows and other lanes could see lower flow due to lane choice.
>> I would expect the simulated edge flow to be no higher than the
>> defined flow.
>> An exception might happen if vehicles cannot be inserted for some
>> time and then are released into the simulation at a later time,
>> thereby increasing the flow beyond the specified value.
>> Things to check for:
>> - edge flow vs expected flow at different time aggregations
>> - depart delay (trip info), delayed departures per lane (gui
>> coloring style)
>> - departLane definition for your flows
>>
>> regards,
>> Jakob
>>
>> Am Fr., 6. März 2020 um 01:52 Uhr schrieb Chedly Bourguiba
>> <chedly@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have an intersection where I know the exact vehicle count per
>>> lane and movement per hour (a specific hour). When running sumo, I
>>> define the flow XML file using the vehicle per hour attribute and
>>> then I compare the count I had for the specific hour that I
>>> modeled and some lanes would have a count higher than the value I
>>> used to model the flow.
>>> Do you have any leads/idea where the discrepancy can come from?
>>> Thank you in advance for your help!
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Chedly
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sumo-user mailing list
>>> sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
>>> unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>> _______________________________________________
>> sumo-user mailing list
>> sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
>> unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
> _______________________________________________
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user