| Re: [sumo-user] Sumo Vs meso |
It's hard to answer this generally. Meso and miro are different models so there will be many situations in which they produce different results.You first have to figure out whether the sumo flow is too low (e.g. due to road nework problems) or whether the the meso flow is too high (which can be due to the used options).There is no meso option called tl-logic (but there is one for tls and one for junction control) so you need to be more precise on the used option.regards,Jakob_______________________________________________Am Mi., 29. Mai 2019 um 07:47 Uhr schrieb rony gracious <rony.grcs@xxxxxxxxx>:For the same flow sumo is taking around 2 hours of extra simulated time then meso which accounts for this extra counts._______________________________________________On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:02 AM rony gracious <rony.grcs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:While I run meso for a 5 hour simulation with loop detectors placed there is a considerable difference in vehicle count from when I do the same with sumo. When I took vehicle count every 30 minutes meso had atleast 100 vehicles more than sumo in each time step of 30 minutes.Can anyone tell me why that is and how I can get more closer to a sumo SIM with meso. The only parameters I am using is mesosim true and meso tl logic true which is in mesoscopic.Rony Gracious
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user