|
Hi Bijal,
when constructing your internal graph
you must look at the direction of edges (and preserve them).
In the original net the node 10 (or 9
in your notation) has only incoming edges, so it cannot be an
intermediate node on a valid route.
Greetings, Harald
Am 03.04.19 um 07:42 schrieb Bijal:
Dear Michael,
AS
per your suggestion,I have written code to get
Edge Id from supplied Previous node and NextNode.
But
in the case where
previous edge
(Say 5) and next edge (Say 3), I am not getting
Edge Id. Because i am using for edge in x.getOutgoing().
Is
there any way to get all the edges attached with
node say X?
for
x in graph.getNodes():
if(str(int(x.getID()) - 1) == str(prenode)):
print 'Out Going Edge of :' + str(x.getID())
+ ' Are ' + str(x.getOutgoing())
for edge in
x.getOutgoing():
#print
str(int(str(edge.getToNode().getID()))-1) + ' == ' +
str(nextnode)
#check if Next node of this edge is
nextnode??
if(int(str(edge.getToNode().getID()))-1
== nextnode):
print 'Selected Edge ID is ' +
str(edge.getID())
return str(edge.getID())
Output
:
trace
[0, 6, 9, 7, 8, 3, 2, 1, 5, 4] ----> List of nodes to
be selected in the route
Out
Going Edge of :1 Are [<edge id="1" from="1" to="2"/>,
<edge id="2" from="1" to="7"/>]
Selected
Edge ID is 2
Out
Going Edge of :7 Are [<edge id="14" from="7" to="8"/>,
<edge id="15" from="7" to="10"/>]
Selected
Edge ID is 15
Out
Going Edge of :10 Are []
--No Edge identified
Out
Going Edge of :8 Are [<edge id="16" from="8" to="9"/>,
<edge id="17" from="8" to="10"/>]
Selected
Edge ID is 16
Out
Going Edge of :9 Are [<edge id="18" from="9"
to="10"/>]
--No
Edge identified
Out
Going Edge of :4 Are [<edge id="7" from="4" to="5"/>,
<edge id="8" from="4" to="9"/>]
--No
Edge identified
Out
Going Edge of :3 Are [<edge id="5" from="3" to="5"/>,
<edge id="6" from="3" to="4"/>]
--No
Edge identified
Out
Going Edge of :2 Are [<edge id="3" from="2" to="3"/>,
<edge id="4" from="2" to="6"/>]
Selected
Edge ID is 4
Out
Going Edge of :6 Are [<edge id="12" from="6" to="7"/>,
<edge id="13" from="6" to="8"/>]
Dear Sir,
Now adjacency matrix filled fine and ACO
ALGORITHM works nicely.
I am getting list of vertexes, Traversed
by ant in shortest way :
Like [0,1,3,4,5,7,8,9,6,2]
Issue : I can get from and to field to
build edge using this vertex.
But to create a route I need following :
<Edge Id= from= to=>
Is there anyway to get edge ID to build
a route out of this vertex list?
Send sumo-user
mailing list submissions to
sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body
'help' to
sumo-user-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
sumo-user-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is
more specific
than "Re: Contents of sumo-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Traffic Light (iCashWave)
2. Re: Traffic Light (Jakob Erdmann)
3. Re: Convert sumolib.net.readnet Graph to
Adjacency Matrix (Bijal)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:24:50 +0800
From: iCashWave <icashwave@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Sumo project User discussions <sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [sumo-user] Traffic Light
Message-ID:
<CAAUjJ+U+XCxi9Uy_BuKw+wG9c_Q2w5xOy-rjF7Gg+pUCJf1H2g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi,
You should change the light phase,such as chaning G to
r.
Cellen Fadi <mariacellen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
? 2019?3?27? ?? 18:04???
> hello,
>
> I would like to change the priority rule at the
traffic lights. Like you
> see on the picture the green and red phases are
wrong . I have tried to
> select conflict in NETEDIT but it does not work.
Can you help me please.
> Thanks!
>
> best regards
> Fadi
> _______________________________________________
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your
password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/sumo-user/attachments/20190327/c873add7/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 12:14:33 +0100
From: Jakob Erdmann <namdre.sumo@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Sumo project User discussions <sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [sumo-user] Traffic Light
Message-ID:
<CAMbUcby6kWu0n_oRnhDmRV+1s2CdLBhaBj4zFx0EJ0z7VtVu7A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
You must use the traffic light mode of netedit (hotkey
't') to edit traffic
light plans.
Am Mi., 27. M?rz 2019 um 11:25 Uhr schrieb iCashWave
<icashwave@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
> You should change the light phase,such as chaning
G to r.
>
> Cellen Fadi <mariacellen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
? 2019?3?27? ?? 18:04???
>
>> hello,
>>
>> I would like to change the priority rule at
the traffic lights. Like you
>> see on the picture the green and red phases
are wrong . I have tried to
>> select conflict in NETEDIT but it does not
work. Can you help me please.
>> Thanks!
>>
>> best regards
>> Fadi
>>
_______________________________________________
>> sumo-user mailing list
>> sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve
your password, or unsubscribe
>> from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your
password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/sumo-user/attachments/20190327/65e25d65/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:25:13 +0800
From: Bijal <bijal.varia88@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Sumo project User discussions <sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [sumo-user] Convert sumolib.net.readnet
Graph to
Adjacency Matrix
Message-ID:
<CABbss+jjh3_UpsNGvaRc6Fmic8GWdmVE-T4ucWz2rBpzGoMWSQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Dear Sir,
I have converted Graph to Adjacency Matrix. But it
gives wrong intersection
values.
My problem is i am not able to understand why the
value
of edge.getToNode().getID() shows u'5' (variable type
shows Unicode) in
place of Value 5? [Please find photo attached here
with]
I need integer values because i am doing following :
def add_edge(self, u, v, weight=1):
if u in self.vertices and v in self.vertices:
*
self.edges[self.edge_indices[u]][self.edge_indices[v]]
=
weight*
self.edges[self.edge_indices[v]][self.edge_indices[u]]
= weight
return True
else:
return False
Please help me to solve this issue.
[image: image.png]
--
*:)*
Bijal Varia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/sumo-user/attachments/20190327/b8ea9bf3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 248841 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/sumo-user/attachments/20190327/b8ea9bf3/attachment.png>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your
password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
End of sumo-user Digest, Vol 21, Issue 106
******************************************
--
_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
|
