Thanks for your inputs folks. I'll open a ticket so we can start by the archetypes and then move to the UI after the revamp
Em seg., 19 de fev. de 2024 01:20, hantsy bai via starter-dev <starter-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
In JakartaEE applications, Arquillain extension drone and ArquillainGphene are good to test JSF-like UI components, but they are not so active in the latest years.
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:51 AM Reza Rahman via starter-dev <starter-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Testing is always a good thing. I suggest waiting to write UI
tests after Kito is done revamping the UI. The UI may change
substantially.
The Archetype testing is actually very weak right now. We could
use much more robust tests there.
On 2/18/2024 1:32 PM, Jeyvison
Nascimento via starter-dev wrote:
Hi, folks.
The complexity of the UI is getting a bit bigger and is kinda
difficult to correctly test and validate the changes
introduced.
I'm thinking about adding some testing framework(Selenium?)
so we can make sure every PR comes with the necessary tests
that can make the changes sager. Before adding anything I'd
like to hear your thoughts on this.
This is only a concern for the UI for now since we're
already covering* the cases for the archetype in GH Action.
*Not exactly doing anything but verifying that the
archetype is generated without errors