Re: [starter-dev] UI Testing

[hantsy bai <hantsy@xxxxxxxxx>]

In JakartaEE applications, Arquillain extension drone and ArquillainGphene are good to test JSF-like UI components, but they are not so active in the latest years.

https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-drone

https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-graphene

For pure html behavior/browser testing, have a look at https://www.gebish.org/ which is more friendly than Selenium etc.

---

Regards,

Hantsy Bai

Self-employed consultant, fullstack developer, agile coach, freelancer/remote worker

GitHub: https://github.com/hantsy

Twitter: https://twitter.com/@hantsy

Medium: https://medium.com/@hantsy

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:51 AM Reza Rahman via starter-dev <starter-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Testing is always a good thing. I suggest waiting to write UI tests after Kito is done revamping the UI. The UI may change substantially.

The Archetype testing is actually very weak right now. We could use much more robust tests there.

On 2/18/2024 1:32 PM, Jeyvison Nascimento via starter-dev wrote:

Hi, folks.

The complexity of the UI is getting a bit bigger and is kinda difficult to correctly test and validate the changes introduced.

I'm thinking about adding some testing framework(Selenium?) so we can make sure every PR comes with the necessary tests that can make the changes sager. Before adding anything I'd like to hear your thoughts on this.

This is only a concern for the UI for now since we're already covering* the cases for the archetype in GH Action.

*Not exactly doing anything but verifying that the archetype is generated without errors

--

Jeyvison Nascimento

_______________________________________________
starter-dev mailing list
starter-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/starter-dev

_______________________________________________
starter-dev mailing list
starter-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/starter-dev