| Re: [servlet-dev] References to old versions of the Spec |
On 09/02/2020 22:33, Stuart Douglas wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 8 Feb 2020, 9:31 pm Mark Thomas, <markt@xxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:markt@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> On 03/02/2020 20:05, Stuart Douglas wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 23:18, Mark Thomas <markt@xxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:markt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > <mailto:markt@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:markt@xxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
> >
> > On 31/01/2020 18:37, Bill Shannon wrote:
> > > The history / change log should be removed, or rather
> cleared out and
> > > added to going forward.
> >
> > Just to clarify, do you mean this section should be empty or
> should it
> > contain a single line (assuming it is the only change) that
> says that,
> > compared to Servlet 4.0, the packages have been renamed from
> javax to
> > jakarta ?
> >
> > If the answer to the above question is yes then I guess we'd need
> > another line for "cosmetic only formatting/layout changes as a
> result of
> > importing the specification text"
> >
> >
> > Do we really want to do that? It has been moved from one system to
> > another, so this would be a huge amount of work for and I don't really
> > see any value in it.
>
> I don't understand the concern. Removing most of the changelog content
> and adding a couple of simple lines should be a trivial amount of work
> (it was for JSP anyway). Where do you see the "huge amount" work coming
> from?
>
>
> I misunderstood, I was thinking that there would be a reference to every
> cosmetic change, rather than just a single line. I am going to blame it
> on lack of sleep due to a new baby:-)
No problem. Sorry my explanation wasn't clear. Glad we cleared up the
confusion. I'll leave you to get some sleep ;)
Cheers,
Mark
_______________________________________________
servlet-dev mailing list
servlet-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/servlet-dev