Re: [science-iwg] Hello

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [science-iwg] Hello

From: UOMo <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:41:57 +0100
Delivered-to: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/science-iwg>
List-help: <mailto:science-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg>, <mailto:science-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/science-iwg>, <mailto:science-iwg-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Btw. is the latest version of the objective text in the Wiki? http://wiki.eclipse.org/Science_IWG

One sentence puzzled me a bit:

>Several universities, research facilities and companies still use and develop Eclipse RCP applications to solve problems within a certain scientific scope.

What's with the "still", maybe someone who is a German or other non-English native speaker phrased that, otherwise I am not sure why we'd says "still".

If the objective of this IWG was that they should no longer use and develop Eclipse RCP applications, what do we propose as alternatives?;-)

Werner

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [science-iwg] Hello
  - From: Philip Wenig

Prev by Date: Re: [science-iwg] Hello
Next by Date: Re: [science-iwg] Hello
Previous by thread: Re: [science-iwg] Hello
Next by thread: Re: [science-iwg] Hello
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs