Re: [rest-dev] Proposed change to Committer-Conventions

["Markus Karg" <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I do not like the idea to clutter the main branch with commits just to revert them later.

I wand that each idea is dicussed and riped in a PR, and the PR getting merged *then*.

This is how we did it in the past and I am -1 for doing it in another way, for reasons told already several times.

-Markus

 

 

Von: Arjan Tijms [mailto:arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. März 2024 01:12
An: Markus Karg
Cc: Jakarta Rest project developer discussions; Jim Krueger
Betreff: Re: [rest-dev] Proposed change to Committer-Conventions

 

Hi,

 

On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 17:59, Markus Karg <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

-1 as the past has shown that some committers tend to merge hastily

 

What is too hasty? If we accept that PRs can easily be reverted if needed, and especially if we trust in the committers*, there is really no concept of hasty. Commits and merges come in when they come in.

 

*) If we don't trust someone as a committer, why did that person become a committer in the first place?

 

Kind regards,

Arjan Tijms