Should be available now: https://oss.sonatype.org/#nexus-search;gav~org.eclipse.rdf4j~~5.0.0-RC~~
5.0.0-RC
Cheers, Håvard On 19 Jun 2024, at 12:13, Andreas Schwarte <aschwarte10@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Håvard,
thanks, I think a release candidate makes sense. For us this will work and we would apply it in our develop branch with the hope that we can have the final sign-off from the Eclipse organization in time for our product release (i.e. within the next week). If that is not available by then, we will revisit internally our action plan.
Best, Andreas
I might have dropped the ball on the release review. It's a bit different than last time.
Since I haven't heard anything from the Eclipse Management Organisation I was thinking of publishing a Release Candidate (5.0.0-RC) which would essentially be the same as 5.0.0. Would that work for you Andreas?
Cheers, Håvard
Here is the correct link: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/emo-team/emo/-/issues/765Håvard Hi Andreas,
There are a few PRs open on GitHub that I thought I would review today to see if anything is relevant for the release or if those can wait until til 5.1.0.
I have two bugs that I should try to fix:
Eclipse review is a bit out of my hands. It’s never been an issue before though and I trust that they will be finished on time.
Håvard Hi Havard,
thanks for organizing the release.
Our release is scheduled for Wednesday the 19th of June: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.rdf4j/releases/5.0.0
Could you give an indication if everything is still on track for a release this Wednesday? We would like to get an understanding to see if we can still go to RDF4J 5.0 in our current product release, or whether it would be in our next product release.
Thanks, Andreas
Hi Everyone!
Yesterday I published RDF4J 5.0.0-M3. This is our last and final milestone build before the release. I've merged the develop branch into the main branch and the develop branch can now be used for features for 5.1.0. The main branch will be used for any bug fixes before the final release of 5.0.0.
Our documentation could also use an overhaul. It might also be time to add version support to our documentation so that users can choose which version of RDF4J they are using and get the documentation that is relevant for that version. For our Java docs we have a directory called "latest" and one directory per version (e.g. 4.3.12 and 4.3.11, etc.). If anyone knows of a smarter way to add versioning to our documentation I would really appreciate some help, if not I think I will take the same approach as we do with our Java docs.
Thank you to everyone for all the great contributions to RDF4J!
Cheers, Håvard M. Ottestad
_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev
|