Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [rdf4j-dev] Including Jena and the Topquadrant SHACL implemention

Jena shouldn't be an issue to include as a test dependency, it's an Apache project, and I believe there are in fact already CQs logged for it by other Eclipse projects (though not sure if they use the version you want to use). I'm fine with including it in our test rig as a reference implementation. If at all possible restrict to only the specific part that you need, though.

As for Topquadrant: do you specifically mean this project (https://github.com/TopQuadrant/shacl) ? If so I don't see a problem, though you will likely have to file a new works-with CQ for it.

Cheers,

Jeen

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020, at 07:56, Håvard M. Ottestad wrote:
Hi,

While developing the new abstract syntax tree for the ShaclSail I’ve come across a few test cases that are outright wrong. Radostin at Ontotext found another rather larger mistake in my understanding of how sh:or and sh:and work. 

I would like to include Jena and the Topquadrant reference SHACL implementation as test dependencies for the ShaclSail in order to continuously test our test cases for compliance with the reference implementation. That way we know that all our test cases are correct and that I haven’t misunderstood something and created a wrong test case. 

Is this something I can get you guys on board with?

Håvard
_______________________________________________
rdf4j-dev mailing list
rdf4j-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/rdf4j-dev



Back to the top