Re: [ptp-dev] Recent RDT commits

[Chris Recoskie <recoskie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I would agree with just marking them as x-internal:=true and leaving the version number as is. From what I can see the API tooling doesn't require a version increment for that.

===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto

Greg Watson ---08/10/2010 12:56:14 PM---Vivian, Given this was an oversight for the 4.0 release, I think we can have an exception for the ve

From:	Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	08/10/2010 12:56 PM
Subject:	Re: [ptp-dev] Recent RDT commits
Sent by:	ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Vivian,

Given this was an oversight for the 4.0 release, I think we can have an exception for the version number change.

Thanks,
Greg

On Aug 10, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Vivian Kong wrote:

I'm going to mark all the *.internal.* packages in rdt.core and rdt.ui with x-internal. This will cause an API breakage and the version number have to be 3.0.0 now.

If that's OK with everyone I'll check these changes in.

Regards,

Vivian Kong
IBM Eclipse CDT
IBM Canada Toronto Lab

<graycol.gif>Greg Watson ---08/10/2010 11:01:44 AM---Hi Vivian, Not sure which bug, but the commits were made yesterday. The packages are called ...blah.


<ecblank.gif> From:	<ecblank.gif> Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
<ecblank.gif> To:	<ecblank.gif> Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<ecblank.gif> Date:	<ecblank.gif> 08/10/2010 11:01 AM
<ecblank.gif> Subject:	<ecblank.gif> Re: [ptp-dev] Recent RDT commits
<ecblank.gif> Sent by:	<ecblank.gif> ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---




Hi Vivian,

Not sure which bug, but the commits were made yesterday. The packages are called ...blah.internal.blah, but they are exported from the org.eclipse.ptp.rdt.ui plugin. Exporting them makes them API regardless of what they are called.

Please enable API tooling and you will see the problem.

Thanks,
Greg

On Aug 10, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Vivian Kong wrote:
Hi Greg,

Are you talking about the fix for Bug 321353 ?

I thought John's fix would be ok to check into ptp_4_0 since new APIs are in the internal packages and changes in the public packages are not externally visible.

Regards,

Vivian Kong
IBM Eclipse CDT
IBM Canada Toronto Lab

<graycol.gif>Greg Watson ---08/09/2010 06:17:30 PM---Hi, Some recent commits to RDT plugins in the ptp_4_0 branch have introduced new API's, thereby requ

<ecblank.gif> From:	<ecblank.gif> Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
<ecblank.gif> To:	<ecblank.gif> Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<ecblank.gif> Date:	<ecblank.gif> 08/09/2010 06:17 PM
<ecblank.gif> Subject:	<ecblank.gif> [ptp-dev] Recent RDT commits
<ecblank.gif> Sent by:	<ecblank.gif> ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---




Hi,

Some recent commits to RDT plugins in the ptp_4_0 branch have introduced new API's, thereby requiring a minor version increment. Not only would a 4.1 release require a release review, but I'm not sure if it's possible to include this in SR1. If you need an exception from the version numbering rules, then it needs to be raised on the mailing list for discussion.

Thanks,
Greg_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev


_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev


_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev

_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev