Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ptp-dev] Updated configure.in for PE proxy

Greg
I had the same version of configure on my system as the build version so I 
committed the configure script
Dave



Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: ptp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
05/05/2009 08:34 AM
Please respond to
Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>


To
Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
Re: [ptp-dev] Updated configure.in for PE proxy






Dave,

I usually just re-run automake on my system and it regenerates the 
files that it needs, then I commit those. You need a version of 
automake/autoconf that is at least as recent as the ones used to 
generate the current files, otherwise it complains. If you don't have 
a recent enough version then let me know and I'll do it.

Greg

On May 5, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Dave Wootton wrote:

> Greg
> I just committed a change to configure.in for the PE proxy so that
> LoadLeveler support can be explicitly excluded by specifying  a
> --withoutLoadLeveler flag. I didn't commit a new copy of configure 
> since I
> didn't know if configure needed to be generated with the specific 
> set of
> autoconf tools in the Eclipse build system. If I make changes to
> configure.in or Makefile.am, do I just commit the configure or 
> Makefile.in
> files as well. Are there other files that should be committed at the 
> same
> time? If just committing the files is not a problem, let me know and I
> will do that.
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> ptp-dev mailing list
> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev

_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev




Back to the top